BY DON RUKARE
GLOBAL RIGHTS COUNTRY DIRECTOR, UGANDA
GLOBAL RIGHTS COUNTRY DIRECTOR, UGANDA
HOIMA, Uganda—Multinational oil companies are not likely to start tapping Uganda’s 2.5 billion barrels of crude oil reserves until 2018, but community leaders already have begun to address concerns they have with Big Oil’s plans to set up operations in their communities.
This
week, Lien De Brouckere, Global Rights director of natural resources and human
rights, and I traveled to the Albertine Graben districts of Hoima and Bullisa
in southwest Uganda to meet with leaders in the communities where oil companies
Tullow and Total plan to set up their operations.
Despite
the excitement about the potential economic benefits from a profitable oil industry, local
leaders identified several concerns they have with oil companies drilling near
their communities. Many community members feel that they are largely unaware how the oil industry operates and how the new Ugandan oil industry will
affect them. There are also concerns about whether people will be properly
compensated for their land and crops that they will have to abandon to make
room for the the
refinery and related infrastructure. Even if people are compensated monetarily, they lack
the knowledge how to use the money to start a new life once they leave
their homes. Other issues include the exclusion of groups such as women, the
elderly, persons with disabilities and youth; the lack of skilled laborers who
could actually work in the refinery; and challenges immigrants from other African countries encounter when claiming rights to the land around the planned oil refinery.
About
65 percent of Ugandans live on less than $2 per day and only 8.5 percent of
Ugandans have access to electricity, according to the latest World Bank
statistics. Ugandans see their oil reserves as a way to alleviate these societal problems, but the country lacks the resources to build the infrastructure needed to extract and refine the oil. Consequently, the country has struck deals with
multinational oil companies Tullow, Total and China National Offshore Oil
Corporation (CNOOC), which have begun laying the groundwork for operations but
won’t start drilling until 2018.
Lien De Brouckere discusses concerns about the nascent Ugandan oil industry with local community leaders |
In
addition to meeting with local leaders, Lien and I also met with government
officials, civil society leaders at the national and local levels,
representatives of oil companies, and religious and cultural leaders—all of
whom have a vested interest in creating a profitable oil industry in Uganda.
From
these discussions, it is clear that there is still a lot to do to create
awareness within the communities on the pros and cons of the oil industry. This
needs to be done in a collaborative, inclusive and non-confrontational manner,
preferably at the village and parish levels. Another viable option is
community-based dialogue that brings together all relevant parties—civil
society, the Ugandan government, and oil companies—including marginalized
groups such as women, people with disabilities, the elderly and youth. It is
also vital that the media, in particular the local radio hosts, disseminate
appropriate messaging to the wider community. In addition to radio broadcasts,
we need to design informational material about the oil business and land laws to
then distribute to the people whose lives the oil refinery will impact.
Next
week, we travel back to Kampala, Uganda’s capital, to meet with central
government officials, oil company officials, civil society organizations and
national conflict-resolution consultants. Following these engagements, we will
write a report to assess the situation and that will include our next steps and
future program to address these issues.
Our
meetings in Uganda are part of a five-year project funded by the U.S. Agency
for International Development (USAID) aimed at building peace and mitigating conflict
among ethnic groups over competing claims to land and oil. Global Rights is
working in partnership with the National Center for State Courts and Search for
Common Ground.
No comments:
Post a Comment